SO MUCH TRAFFIC: UTA research will help commuters make time
saving decisions
It’s a common and costly occurrence
on North Texas freeways: Traffic suddenly slows, then creeps, then stops.
Should you bail at the next exit or stick it out? When will you finally get to
where you’re going? Could you have avoided the problem altogether? Shaun Dodge
asks himself questions like this during the drive from his southeast Arlington
home to his information technology job in Dallas. Although his route stays
roughly the same, the time can vary greatly. On normal days the trip is 40–60
minutes. On bad days it can take two hours.
The North Central Texas Council of
Governments says area motorists drive more than 176 million miles and spend 1.1
million hours in traffic delays every day. The congestion increases travel time
31.5 percent at an annual cost of $4.5 billion, NCTCOG says. By 2035 delay time
and costs are projected to double.
Dodge, a 2002 graduate with a
bachelor’s degree in communication and broadcast management, considers himself a seasoned
commuter with more experience than your average highway jockey. He worked a
couple of years for www.traffic.com, sitting in rush-hour jams and delivering
reports for local news stations.
“Mobility
is one of the dominant issues in our region, and we have access to
comprehensive data that can help motorists and traffic engineers improve how we
navigate major travel corridors.”
“I
developed patience and tolerance for commuting,” he says. He learned to plan
for delays regardless of what he knew beforehand, rather than assuming arrival
times based on smooth sailing. “Everybody in DFW understands that getting anywhere
in this area is going to take a lot of time. You know something unexpected will
happen.”
But this
spring area commuters may begin leaving the unexpected in their rearview
mirrors.
UT
Arlington civil
engineering
Professor SiaArdekani(pictured in top photo)and his team
are working with Dallas Area Rapid Transit, NCTCOG, and several municipalities
on ways to give drivers more precise traffic information. The U.S. Department
of Transportation and DART are funding the $8.3 million, five-year projects,
DFW 5–1-1 and Integrated Corridor Management (ICM). Besides UT Arlington, the
team includes Telvent Corp., Texas A&M’s Texas Transportation
Institute, Southern Methodist University, and Texas Southern University.
DATA DRIVEN
Dr.
Ardekani and his collaborators, who include civil engineering Associate
Professor Steven Mattingly, have developed an expansive computer data network
that is the backbone of the ICM project to help motorists traveling on U.S.
Highway 75 (Central Expressway) and its major neighboring arterials from
downtown Dallas to Texas 121. The data also is being used to create DFW 5–1-1,
a system designed to put comprehensive traffic details at drivers’ fingertips.
“Mobility
is one of the dominant issues in our region, and we have access to
comprehensive data that can help motorists and traffic engineers improve how we
navigate major travel corridors,” Ardekani says. “Our work synthesizes critical
data in a way that will yield better solutions for all of us.”
Most
people don’t realize it, but roadways have had sensors for more than 40 years,
Ardekani says. Detectors buried beneath the pavement invisibly record speed and
congestion.
In some
cases, private vendors collect the data and sell it to states, cities, and
other entities. Or the data collection is above ground, like with a reader that
time stamps vehicles’ toll tags as they pass through. Down the road, another
reader produces data on how long it took the vehicle to get there.
Newer
technology monitors streets other than freeways. Some systems analyze Bluetooth
signals to glean real-time information on how long it takes a vehicle to reach
point B from point A. Same as with the toll tag readers, these systems monitor
only the signals, leaving the owners’ privacy intact.
All
information sources are vital to the success of the 5–1-1 and corridor
management initiatives. Of the two, DFW 5–1-1 is personalized for commuters.
And it will be regionwide, unlike any other system in Texas.
NCTCOG’s
Natalie Bettger says the council works with major cities and other partners to
keep everyone involved. Besides DART and the Texas Department of
Transportation, the players include Dallas, Highland Park, Plano, Richardson,
and University Park, as well as the North Texas Tollway Authority.
Cities
typically collect their own traffic data, but they rarely share it. 5–1-1 will
pull all the region’s information together. For example, someone traveling from
Dallas to an event in Arlington can know what’s happening along the route by
calling a voice-activated system.
The
current TxDOT system provides information based on where the state has field
devices, but “there are gaps in that,” says Bettger, senior program manager at
NCTCOG. “5–1-1 provides information on the whole freeway system.”
Other
components such as weather and the status of transit systems are also a phone
call away. Commuters like Dodge can call 5–1-1, learn the travel time to work,
and find out about accidents along the way. He can save his route so the system
will alert him via text message when there are problems. Then he’ll know for
sure if he should leave home earlier.
“I think
it will be extremely valuable,” he says, “especially as we’re seeing ourselves
move to a more connected, social society where we demand real-time information
in our hands at any give time.”
Ardekani
says motorists using a computer before leaving their home or office can click
on a trip’s origin and destination and quickly get the current travel time
between the two, taking into account weather, traffic, accidents, incidents,
construction, and other variables.
Scheduled
for a public launch this fall, 5–1-1 will keep track of transit such as buses
and light rail. It can suggest travel from origin to destination exclusively on
transit when such options are feasible, complete with departure and arrival
times and trip time estimates.
HIGH-TECH HIGHWAY
Every
driver has endured traffic jams caused by accidents or construction. It’s
inconvenient but understandable. What about those unexplained slowdowns?
“It’s
maddening,” Dodge says. “There seems to be a point on the road where things
just open up. You drive by and you expect to see a lane taken away, an
accident, something that would make sense as to why things would be slow.”
But
there’s nothing. Just traffic, now flowing smoothly.
The ICM
system on U.S. 75 from downtown Dallas to Texas 121, only the second in the
nation (the other is in San Diego), should ease those situations. Beginning
this spring, motorists who see traffic slow and perhaps stop will be given
alternatives by dynamic road signs (often used now for Amber Alerts).
The signs
might say something like “Accident ahead, consider using light rail” or
“Accident ahead, take next exit.”
Behind the
scenes, traffic signals on service roads and side streets change to accommodate
the heavier load as people leave the highway. The DART station might shorten
run times to take on more passengers or add train cars and begin to monitor
parking. When parking lots and trains are full, the dynamic sign might stop
promoting light rail as an alternative.
Historical
data reveals how often accidents occur and where they happen, enabling traffic
engineers to develop scenarios. They can see where commuters might exit the
highway and how traffic signals should be re-timed to accommodate the
additional loads.
There are,
of course, hundreds of scenarios. A fender-bender on U.S. 75 at midnight is one
thing; the same minor mishap blocking traffic at 7:30 a.m. is another. A cattle
truck overturning at 5 a.m. presents a different set of options that would
change as the morning wears on.
Whatever
happens, DalTrans, the traffic control center for Dallas, chooses the
pre-approved response, posts the alternatives on the dynamic sign, and begins
contacting the entities involved for traffic signal modification, rail use, or
bus routes.
Besides
helping drivers, the system has broader implications. Fewer cars idling in
traffic will mean fewer emissions. Faster response to incidents should reduce
the chance of secondary incidents. First responders also may benefit, although
that has yet to be evaluated.
Ardekani,
who will continue to act as project liaison for UT Arlington, says the teams
will meet monthly to examine and tweak the program.
“It’s a
living, evolving system,” he says.
(Article written by Judy Wiley. Reprinted from UTA Magazine)
No comments:
Post a Comment